In this Monday, Aug. 31, 2015, file photo, New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady leaves federal court, in New York. Lawyers who want Brady to put “Deflategate” behind him for good are ready to make their pitch to a New York appeals court. NFL lawyers are asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Thursday, March 3, 2016, to reinstate Brady’s four-game suspension. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, File)

NEW YORK (AP) – A federal appeals panel in New York is questioning NFL attorneys on why the simple act of deflating footballs warranted the four-game suspension the league gave New England quarterback Tom Brady.

The grilling by the three judges came Thursday as lawyers for the NFL asked the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate Brady’s suspension for the “Deflategate” controversy.

Judge Barrington Parker asked NFL attorney Paul Clement how a deflated football was even beneficial to a player.

Every player has a preference on how like they like footballs. Some like them overinflated while others prefer underinflated. The league has set a standard weight.

Clement argues Brady’s suspension is reasonable.

If the judges rule in the league’s favor, Brady may have to sit out the first four games this year. The court is unlikely to rule for weeks.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.