Welcome Guest | Register for Email Newsletter | Member Benefits

Local Weather Forecast
Today:
Current:75
Thursday:
90/72
Friday:
94/75
Complete Forecast for  Jul 24 2008

Top Jobs

Top Homes

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Reader Responses

Posted on Saturday, May 03, 2008
Email This   Print This   
May 3: Growth Implications
In your editorial Sunday, April 27, concerning the mayor's race you expressed satisfaction at the direction Tyler has taken over the past dozen years.

You suggested either Barbara Bass or Laura Corbett would continue on essentially the same path and and this I am in complete agreement. Both those candidates are committed to the path of "growth and development" that is supported by the political and financial establishment in Smith County.

But I would like people to consider the full implications of the growth being promoted.

Consider the many stories carried in the Tyler Paper over the years in which various citizen groups asked government for relief from this or that development project only to be rebuffed. Whether it is a high rise hotel looking onto their back yards, a gigantic development scheme that will bring traffic and pollution to a formerly green space or the building of dangerous petroleum facilities in a residential area, the answer is always "we must have development."

When people wonder why traffic congestion has become unbearable, why tens of millions must be spent on a new jail or why people must be driven from their homes to accommodate yet more roads and highways, the answer is, in fact, "growth and development."

Growth certainly brings profit to some people. The real estate broker, the property developer, the banker and the land speculator have all enriched their bank accounts with proceeds earned through growth and development. I begrudge no one a fairly earned profit but ordinary people have fared considerably less well.

Costs of new jails, new courtrooms, new roads, airport improvement, new schools, new government office buildings and inevitably, more government employees will not be the only burden on our citizens. The increase in crime and traffic congestion is an indirect tax levied on everyone in Smith County as is the general degradation of the quality of life and the environment. While the few have profited from growth, it is everyone who will pay the costs.

If Tyler and Smith county were places of high unemployment there might be some justification for pursuing policies of high growth, but that is not the case. I have yet to see any serious discussion of whether people, not just the elites, want Tyler to become another Dallas, replete with crime, high taxes and all the other ills big cities demonstrate.

To say we can become a major metropolis and escape the negative consequences is, at best, naive and, more probably, self-serving.

The time has come for a full and forthright public debate on this issue and I would like to hear all three candidates for mayor give their views on this subject as the start of that debate.

Eric Rathbone
Smith County Chair
Libertarian Party of Texas


Comment on this article!
Note: You must login or register to post comments. Comments must be approved by Moderator before appearing on the site. Use the links below to login or register.
  FAQFAQ     SearchSearch Forums        Log inLog in      RegisterRegister 
 Topics   Replies  Author  Last Post 
Some Opinion from the candidates?
0 Bill Bala
Bill Bala View latest post
New comment »
More Reader Responses
  • July 23: Time To Speak Out
  • July 23: Obama Statement Irritates Tyler Reader
  • July 23: No Divided Allegiance
  • July 23: Disappointed
  • July 21: Temporary Shift
  • July 20: True To Form
  • July 20: Reader Says This Information A Gusher
  • July 20: Choice For Children?
  • July 20: Background Check
  • July 19: Unaddressed Area
  • July 17: What Is Best
  • July 17: Tylerite Doesn't Believe In Recession Talk
  • July 17: Many Suffering
  • July 17: Keeping Our Guns
  • July 16: Reader Says Name Thoene For Precinct 2
  • July 16: Improve Efficiency
  • July 16: Continue To Whine
  • July 13: Waste Of Money
  • July 13: Sailing Still Eluding Drivers
  • July 13: Plan Questioned
  • July 13: Fruitless Search
  • Will Obama's Shift On Key Issues Cost Him Support?
  • July 10: Different View Of Guantanamo Presented
  • July 10: Why Can't We Learn?
  • July 10: Awesome Issue
  • July 10:Absurd Agreement
  • July 7: Down With Dems
  • July 7: Demise of America
  • July 7: Americans May Rebel On Privacy Issues
  • July 6: Action Sought
  • July 5: Reader Says France No. 1 In Health Care
  • July 5: Good Luck
  • July 5: Energy Solutions
  • July 5: Disappointed
  • July 2: Vote Dismays Alliance
  • July 2: Reader Says Bellwood Decision Just For Cash
  • July 2: Trashy Television
  • Reader Outlines Terrible Situation
  • Obama's History Not In Line With Gun Rights
  • June 29: Terrorists Never Cease Plotting Against West
  • June 29: Someone Pays
  • June 29: Shallow Talks
  • June 29: America Expiring?
  • June 27: No Immunity For Telecoms
  • June 27: Legal Rights
  • June 27: Help Americans First
  • June 27: Constitution Protection Not All-Encompassing
  • June 23: Hensarling Praise
  • June 23:Government, Industry Must Work Together
  • How Would Making Gas Cash-Only Affect You?
  • June 22: The Buck Stops There
  • June 22: Personal Challenge
  • June 22: Oil Field Veteran Links Drilling To Prosperity
  • June 22: Lacking Vision
  • June 22: Environment Major Concern
  • June 15: Wake Up Soon
  • June 15: Stand Vigilant Against Foreign Ideologies
  • June 15: People Will Pay
  • June 15: Misuse Of Power
  • June 15: Change, Experience
  • Readers Divided On Issue Of Allowing Concealed Weapons In Parks
  • June 9: Wealth Comes To Fore In Care Availability
  • June 9: Re-Writing History
  • June 9: Out Of Control
  • June 8: Many Avenues To Failure With Tyler Medians
  • June 8: In Need Of Harmony
  • June 8: Election
  • June 8: Bill Based On Hoax
  • June 7: Reader Sees Obama Presidency As Costly
  • June 7: Idiotic Lawsuits
  • June 7: Amused Democrat
  • June 4: Refugee Problem
  • June 4: Lights Out
  • June 4: Federal Employees
  • June 4: Eddie Haskell Tricks At Work In Campaign
  • Readers Offer Their Ideas On Gas Conservation
  • June 2: Vet Feels Denigrated By Obama's Remarks
  • June 2: Getting Out Of Mess
  • June 1: Release Questioned
  • June 1: Demand Better
  • June 1: Support Given For Judge's Courts Proposal
  • May 31: Questions Leadership
  • May 31: Is Appalled
  • May 31: Don't Let Feds Get Local Post Office's Number
  • May 31: Don't Get It
  • Readers Against Idea Of Cities Owning, Operating Hotels
  • May 25: Reader Puts Gas Blame At Feet Of Dems
  • May 25: Cause For Concern
  • May 25: Arrogance Appalling
  • May 24: Reader Believes Rep. Cook Overstepping Bounds
  • May 24: Changes Coming
  • May 24: Carter Assessment
  • May 24: Be Careful
  • May 22: New Leader Invites Public To TJC Graduations
  • May 22: Drill For Alaska Oil
  • May 22: A Solution?
  • May 21: Taxing Retirement
  • May 21: Reader Proffers Another Look At Jail Planning
  • May 21: Negotiations
  • May 21: McCain's Plan
  • News |  Sports |  Business |  Opinion |  Features |  Food |  |  Arts & Entertainment |  Religion |  FAQ
    Contact Us |  Who We Are |  About Us |  Print Services |  Tyler Paper Jobs | 
    Copyright Policy |  Privacy Policy |  Authorized Use Agreement |  Terms & Conditions of Use